2Biased wrote:
Just scare tactics as far as I'm aware. What a lot of people don't realise is, yes, they have new cameras that probably can catch us, but in order to catch us, they will need to have someone watching that camera 24/7 and if they don't have that, they have to spend even more time and resources to go back to the saved footage.
I agree with your view of 'red lights' so to speak. If you do get caught, you weren't doing anything illegal but trespassing, remember that your camera and your photos are alibi's (in terms of showing them what you were doing, as opposed to vandalism etc.)
Not scare tactics, I know of multiple people who have been busted off cameras, myself included. Hell, I've even heard of people being caught at a later date by them getting their faces matched somehow, although they usually wouldn't go to this kind of extremity unless you did some serious vandalism.
A lot of places with cameras also have motion detectors or other sorts of alarms, and once they are set off, they go back and check the footage. Within 5 minutes, you have cops or security at the site.
Also, trespassing is illegal and, in my experience and from those around me, you will get busted even if you say you're a photographer. It's not a proper excuse in the name of the law; maybe to security, but not to police. Best to dispose of your photos so they can't charge you with anything else (heard of people receiving additional charges, i.e. trespassing charges for another site photographed on the same SD card, high risk activity charges based off photos), and if you're lucky, they might not have enough evidence to accuse you of trespassing either.
It also should be mentioned that, in the name of the law, what you consider trespassing is more than likely break and entering in most cases. Opening an unlocked door is break and entering, for example.