Login RegisterFAQ
Something that really pisses me off about urbex. - Page 3
User avatar
By
1 Reply with quote Permalink
Decimalz wrote:@DFEX - I can think of at least 3 legals in the inner west.
@peterh13 - that's just shameful. Better off licking a sweaty mexican than drinking that mud.
Ive been to Mexico and licked a sweaty Mexican and her sister. But thats another story.
User avatar
By
0 Reply with quote Permalink
DFEX wrote:
blakjak wrote: Semantics.
Not really, one you get arrested one you dont, one you have gained prior approval the other is free to use whenever. Very different, especially in the eyes of the law!
Um, what part of legal graff wall don't ya get? Whether it's govt or private it is legal to graff it, you don't have to ask for permission.

Are you one of those guys that never admits that he's wrong when he clearly is?
Blakjak of the Sydney branch of the Cave Clan.
User avatar
By
2 Reply with quote Permalink
Who f*****g cares.
User avatar
By
0 Reply with quote Permalink
blakjak wrote:
DFEX wrote:
blakjak wrote: Semantics.
Not really, one you get arrested one you dont, one you have gained prior approval the other is free to use whenever. Very different, especially in the eyes of the law!
Um, what part of legal graff wall don't ya get? Whether it's govt or private it is legal to graff it, you don't have to ask for permission.

Are you one of those guys that never admits that he's wrong when he clearly is?
No, its just miscommunication because of the way you described it. To me it sounded like the artists had arranged to do a production, not just a wall anyone can paint at anytime.
Just as evolution intended, I was designed by DFEX..

IG: @social_dfex
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dfexone/
 Post a reply
Go