yeah thats the one, just a typo haha. ive heard some good reviews so im thinking of picking that one upphytrix wrote:Did you mean the Nikon D3100? If so, then you're better off getting the D3200. It's pretty much the best of beginners DSLRs from the research that I've done. I also own one, so there's a bit of bias there, but still...
Got one too, its a nice little unit.Modular wrote:yeah thats the one, just a typo haha. ive heard some good reviews so im thinking of picking that one upphytrix wrote:Did you mean the Nikon D3100? If so, then you're better off getting the D3200. It's pretty much the best of beginners DSLRs from the research that I've done. I also own one, so there's a bit of bias there, but still...
I started off with the 600D. Amazing camera. The D3100 though will have a slightly better sensor.Modular wrote:i was thining about the cannon 600D or the nikon d3100. any other alts for a good beginer camera???
Get off A-mount before it's too late.peterh13 wrote:I love my Sony A65.
The D3300 is Nikon's newer entry level SLR and has better high ISO performance than the D3200.phytrix wrote:Did you mean the Nikon D3100? If so, then you're better off getting the D3200. It's pretty much the best of beginners DSLRs from the research that I've done. I also own one, so there's a bit of bias there, but still...
The D3200 is cheaper and has higher dynamic range. While both differences in noise control and DR are small, ISO is easier to control because tripod. Haha.Light Knight wrote:The D3300 is Nikon's newer entry level SLR and has better high ISO performance than the D3200.phytrix wrote:Did you mean the Nikon D3100? If so, then you're better off getting the D3200. It's pretty much the best of beginners DSLRs from the research that I've done. I also own one, so there's a bit of bias there, but still...