Right you are. Same thing on the official phpbb website actually..No+Pro wrote:nice
may just be me but when i delete a msg from within the msg, if that makes sense, it stays in my inbox. can still delete from inbox ok
The old theme is incompatible with phpBB 3.1 ..Mambo wrote:Where's the option to change the theme gone?
Fixed as.No+Pro wrote:nice
may just be me but when i delete a msg from within the msg, if that makes sense, it stays in my inbox. can still delete from inbox ok
Was this for compatibility btw?Mambo wrote:Where's the option to change the theme gone?
I don't like the look and layout of the current theme. The old one was a lot easier to navigate and looked better.aydun wrote:Was this for compatibility btw?Mambo wrote:Where's the option to change the theme gone?
I did some testing, it should work perfectly IE9 onwards and should work on practically any recent version of FF and Chrome.
IE7 and 8, unfortunately it looks a bit wacky on those, but I added a hack so those browsers will at least show the menu items now, so control panel and logout button are at least accessible, whereas before they weren't.
+1Mambo wrote: I don't like the look and layout of the current theme. The old one was a lot easier to navigate and looked better.
That's fair. According to phpbb stats, only 2 people were using the old theme, so unfortunately I can't justify the time to convert it, sorry. However, if the author does, I will definitely reinstall it for you! As for ease of use, mind if I ask what you preferred? Perhaps I can incorporate it.Mambo wrote:I don't like the look and layout of the current theme. The old one was a lot easier to navigate and looked better.
That's kind of what menus are for, to contain similar items in the one placetheedge wrote:It seems harder to navigate with everything buried under one menu while in the old interface all the links were in front of you as you now need an extra click to get to where you want to go. So I quite liked having all those links laid out in front of me. And it still looked fine on my cellphone even though I know it is not html5.
If we are going with this menu layout, we probably should name "Links" to Menu.
Programmers...aydun wrote:That's kind of what menus are for, to contain similar items in the one placePreviously everything was scattered around the header, which by any UX standards, is pretty poor practice. Plus, two clicks is much faster than zooming and trying to click the button, especially for a new user.. Imagine the mess if web browsers didn't have menus!
Also, by UX practices, 'links' makes more sense. Links is a menu, yes. But you name an element after what it contains, not what it is. Otherwise every drop-down element would be named menu. I understand changes may be difficult to get used to, and of course suggestions are more than welcome, but in this case, I'll follow how phpBB does it.
They're not really actions. The title, 'Actions', would be appropriate for 'mark read', 'subscribe forum', etc.theedge wrote:"Forum Actions", "Actions"
I may try this next update. The only thing is that it depends which link people use the most... I personally use 'unread posts'. Although it literally takes me less than a second to click it (or any of the other links) now, anyway.theedge wrote:"Active topics" or "new posts" could be taken out of the menu and put by itself as that would be what users go for catch up on updates..
In the real world you probably also shouldn't work on things while drinkingtheedge wrote:And in the real world it is a bad idea lecturing users especially when it gets technical.