That's what I prefer. I've heard of protected batteries having problems because often they're longer than the specification for those batteries, and can be crushed by torches that have tight tolerances on the battery dimensions. I had this happen in a torch of mine except (luckily) it was the torch that broke before the battery shorted out.theedge wrote:Yes that's the story I saw. Looks like other options are to get a charger system that cuts off when fully charged (eg: Soshine, Pila).
Unregulated circuitry.Joker wrote:Back to the P7, the torch seems to be getting considerably dimmer over time. I didn't think that these type of leds did this, any suggestions?
As factory fitted to TANKS putting out 150 million candlepowerANVSS-3A Battlefield Illuminator
Technical Characteristics
Type of light – Visible or infrared
Type of lamp – Xenon short arc – 1 kilowatt
Output candlepower – 50 million minimum
Beam width:
Compact – 1.0 +/- 0.5 degrees
Variable – 1.0 to 7.0 degrees
Voltage – 22 to 28 VDC
Current - 58 amperes
Power – 1,600 watts
Cooling system – Air to air heat exchanger using intake/exhaust blower
Reflective system – Metal parabolic mirror
Focus-defocus method – motor driven
Searchlight control – Provide by control box and remote control
Reflector - 14"
Ask how much they're being driven by to get a realistic idea of their output.benderz wrote:Can anyone offer some advice on either of these:
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/2000-Lm-Zoom ... 43ba15369a
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/4000-Lumens- ... 19d9a3881b
One is 2000lm, the other is 4000 with the price difference $20 to $32. The 2000lm seems way more popular, but would the 4000lm be noticibly better?
Nah bro... seems perfect.zebulon wrote:Is that too many ?
Not exactly portable though
Indeed, if only it was packaged in at most a 3D MaglightJoker wrote:Nah bro... seems perfect.zebulon wrote:Is that too many ?
Not exactly portable though
Personally, i don't like maglights. They are over priced from america and unless you use a fat ass one for defence. (madmaw)zebulon wrote:Indeed, if only it was packaged in at most a 3D MaglightJoker wrote:Nah bro... seems perfect.zebulon wrote:Is that too many ?
Not exactly portable though
No fix unfortunately. Just degradation of the LED due to it being poor quality.benderz wrote:I bought this cree a while ago and it has lost a noticeable amount of light and is now quite dim. I would say from when I bought it, it is now working at about 60%.
I have used different batteries to no avail and check connections which seem to be fine. Anyone else had this issue and a fix?
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/2000-Lm-Zoom ... 43ba15369a
I just bought 2 of them. They work well so far but I wasn't expecting much. Very bright. Great distance when focused. Def not water proof!!!benderz wrote:Crap. I will have to find something with a bit better build quality and hope for the best. Was good while it lasted though.
Yeah, when I first got it I even thought it was too bright for night pics. I have been looking around at other lights and may just go for the devil I know. I havent tested the waterproof-ness yet but it has certainly been dropped and thrown around a bit.Barnz wrote:I just bought 2 of them. They work well so far but I wasn't expecting much. Very bright. Great distance when focused. Def not water proof!!!benderz wrote:Crap. I will have to find something with a bit better build quality and hope for the best. Was good while it lasted though.