Something that really pisses me off about urbex. - Page 2

peterh13 · 03 Jun 2015, 8:03 pm

I like corona.

cool_guy85 · 04 Jun 2015, 11:07 am

@DFEX - I can think of at least 3 legals in the inner west.
@peterh13 - that's just shameful. Better off licking a sweaty mexican than drinking that mud.

DFEX · 04 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm

Decimalz wrote:@DFEX - I can think of at least 3 legals in the inner west.

I live in the "Real" west lol and they knocked em all down out this way. Where bouts and how recently have you heard they are legal. Many councils changed there views on legal walls because they didn't see any decline in graffiti around the area.

f1ex · 04 Jun 2015, 6:49 pm

DFEX wrote:
Decimalz wrote:@DFEX - I can think of at least 3 legals in the inner west.
I live in the "Real" west lol and they knocked em all down out this way. Where bouts and how recently have you heard they are legal. Many councils changed there views on legal walls because they didn't see any decline in graffiti around the area.

I've never painted and I know of at least three..

DFEX · 04 Jun 2015, 8:20 pm

[quote="f1ex"][quote="DFEX"][quote="Decimalz"]@DFEX - I can think of at least 3 legals in the inner west.[/quote] I live in the "Real" west lol and they knocked em all down out this way. Where bouts and how recently have you heard they are legal. Many councils changed there views on legal walls because they didn't see any decline in graffiti around the area.[/quote]
I've never painted and I know of at least three..[/quote]
Like a place you can go paint 24/7, not just a production that people have done?

blakjak · 04 Jun 2015, 9:22 pm

DFEX wrote:Not in Sydney anymore, mayb one or two if you can find them. Most councils went around and tore them down, one actually got torn down in front of me while i was halfway thru painting

Well this one (inner Sydney) is private property, they can't knock it down. It's usually a corner property that the owner got sick of repainting every time it got trashed so they come to an agreement.
I used to practice on the back wall of my parent's house, my mum skitzed at first but she got over it.

DFEX · 05 Jun 2015, 6:14 am

blakjak wrote:
DFEX wrote:Not in Sydney anymore, mayb one or two if you can find them. Most councils went around and tore them down, one actually got torn down in front of me while i was halfway thru painting
Well this one (inner Sydney) is private property, they can't knock it down. It's usually a corner property that the owner got sick of repainting every time it got trashed so they come to an agreement.
I used to practice on the back wall of my parent's house, my mum skitzed at first but she got over it.

Thats usually a production, a wall a group of artists do in agreement with the owner to prevent vandalism. A legal wall is for general public and usually supplied by the council in say a park or something

blakjak · 05 Jun 2015, 9:02 am

DFEX wrote:
blakjak wrote:
DFEX wrote:Not in Sydney anymore, mayb one or two if you can find them. Most councils went around and tore them down, one actually got torn down in front of me while i was halfway thru painting
Well this one (inner Sydney) is private property, they can't knock it down. It's usually a corner property that the owner got sick of repainting every time it got trashed so they come to an agreement.
I used to practice on the back wall of my parent's house, my mum skitzed at first but she got over it.
Thats usually a production, a wall a group of artists do in agreement with the owner to prevent vandalism. A legal wall is for general public and usually supplied by the council in say a park or something

Semantics.

DFEX · 05 Jun 2015, 10:06 am

blakjak wrote: Semantics.

Not really, one you get arrested one you dont, one you have gained prior approval the other is free to use whenever. Very different, especially in the eyes of the law!

No+Pro · 05 Jun 2015, 10:45 am

DFEX wrote:
blakjak wrote: Semantics.
Not really, one you get arrested one you dont, one you have gained prior approval the other is free to use whenever. Very different, especially in the eyes of the law!

This forum does not tolerate anti - semantic remarks

DFEX · 05 Jun 2015, 10:58 am

No+Pro wrote:
DFEX wrote:
blakjak wrote: Semantics.
Not really, one you get arrested one you dont, one you have gained prior approval the other is free to use whenever. Very different, especially in the eyes of the law!
This forum does not tolerate anti - semantic remarks

Do you mean anti-semEntic? Cause i love juice

DFEX · 05 Jun 2015, 11:06 am

DFEX · 05 Jun 2015, 11:23 am

No+Pro wrote:
DFEX wrote:
blakjak wrote: Semantics.
Not really, one you get arrested one you dont, one you have gained prior approval the other is free to use whenever. Very different, especially in the eyes of the law!
This forum does not tolerate anti - semantic remarks

Your def no+pro at spelling

No+Pro · 05 Jun 2015, 11:55 am

Neither are your, bud

DFEX · 05 Jun 2015, 12:09 pm

No+Pro wrote:Neither are your, bud

how dare you!

i only ever use my phone on here, which has auto correct. What your excuse?

DFEX · 05 Jun 2015, 12:22 pm

No+Pro · 05 Jun 2015, 12:30 pm

DFEX wrote:

That pic would be heaps better if there was a mistake in there somewhere. You have too much faith in you're autocorrect, I'm on my phone (bored in an airport) but haven't mistyped anything so far.

DFEX · 05 Jun 2015, 12:54 pm

No+Pro wrote:
DFEX wrote:
That pic would be heaps better if there was a mistake in there somewhere. You have too much faith in you're autocorrect, I'm on my phone (bored in an airport) but haven't mistyped anything so far.

Well firstly i didn't make the pic so dont really have control over the content, and secondly i dont put any faith at all in autocorrect! Its just a convenient tool, doesn't mean I need it to survive.. Pretty sure this all started with incorrect spelling on your behalf, so glad to see your picking up your game now

phytrix · 05 Jun 2015, 1:15 pm

I could totally be that guy who points out that both of you used the incorrect version of your(and variants)

cool_guy85 · 05 Jun 2015, 2:08 pm

Decimalz wrote:I can think of at least 3 legals in the inner west.

Actually make that 5 in a 10km radius.

DFEX wrote:Where bouts

No thanks.

timdole · 05 Jun 2015, 2:11 pm

It's a shame NSW isn't like the ACT, there's 24 legal sites around Canberra, and they aren't even small...

http://www.tams.act.gov.au/city-service ... fiti_sites

^pics stolen

phytrix · 05 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm

timdole wrote:It's a shame NSW isn't like the ACT

It comes at the sacrifice of being surrounded with arrogant, self-obsessed, white-collar dbags though >.>

maggot · 05 Jun 2015, 6:15 pm

DFEX wrote: Pretty sure this all started with incorrect spelling on your behalf

DFEX · 06 Jun 2015, 2:32 pm

DFEX wrote:...
Cause i love juice

Dw i got it

Midget · 07 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm

That's*