x2Barnz wrote:Any stat updates?
Just thought of that as well.Shoe wrote:I wonder how much of that is spam? Hell, I'd even donate if it meant getting a more secure website.
You hit the nail on the head, whats this unique stuff? Should be " genuine" visits.Midget wrote:Just thought of that as well.Shoe wrote:I wonder how much of that is spam? Hell, I'd even donate if it meant getting a more secure website.
Must be like;
Unique Visits/month: 210
Non-bot Unique Visits/month: 30
562 'members' out of 718 have 0 posts. That's over 78% (cue nerd joke).Crane wrote:I've noticed a lot of members on here who have never posted. Surely that can't be very secure, having lurkers trawling the forums. Have those accounts been created by an automated system?
*over 9000.Crane wrote:562 'members' out of 718 have 0 posts. That's over 78% (cue nerd joke).Crane wrote:I've noticed a lot of members on here who have never posted. Surely that can't be very secure, having lurkers trawling the forums. Have those accounts been created by an automated system?
+1Poker wrote:I'm a bot stealing your internets.
Seriously though, it is wise to get rid of lurkers & bots, especially when discussing trivial crimes like recreational trespassing.
Could just send out an alert asking all members to post a message in a given time (a week or 3) & those people who do not respond should have their accounts frozen, at least until they do.
That way you know who is who. Just sayin'.