Umm they weren't urban explorers. You've made your point and we're just getting tired of it.Nmcgregor wrote:I understand those who are not open to change. But those who are (& I've already been contacted by several), DM & I'm happy to meet in person to discuss. This is NOT trolling, this is legit, remember even explorers where paid back in the day.
Uh, not really. Explorers worked for great financial rewards, we do it for the hobby, often for great financial deficits. We explore places that have previously been inhabited, they look for land which hasn't (or at least that is the intention). They demanded great navigational and sailing skills, which some would claim are practical skills, while our skills lie in photography and methods of infiltration. Explorers and urban explorers are completely different; just because they share a single word in their titles does not mean they are similar. A mechanic and a quantum mechanist aren't remotely similar, same goes here.Nmcgregor wrote:They were not urban explorers, but they where explorers & in that era they were of the same breed as the urban explorers today. We all should be proud of that.
I was thinking the same thing.No+Pro wrote:Aahh where were you brave, selfless location preservers when this one was under fire?
I'm sure youse could have convinced woolies not to knock it down for a coupla thousand a years worth of filum shoots. Definitely worth more than a Supermarkesters and gym to them
+1phytrix wrote:So essentially you want to gather a database of locations in order to sell them off to movie producers, hence locking the site down for a considerable period during filming? And from there, you claim the council wants to help protect these places, or do you just mean the council will give these producers legal access in exchange for a sum of money?
Sounds dodgy to me. You're in it for your own professional interests, nothing more.
you're still here, huh?Nmcgregor wrote:Let's look to the future & prevent this happening again.
Where abouts is this, is it still standing ?No+Pro wrote:Aahh where were you brave, selfless location preservers when this one was under fire?
I'm sure youse could have convinced woolies not to knock it down for a coupla thousand a years worth of filum shoots. Definitely worth more than a Supermarkesters and gym to them
it is hereBrodes wrote:Where abouts is this, is it still standing ?No+Pro wrote:Aahh where were you brave, selfless location preservers when this one was under fire?
I'm sure youse could have convinced woolies not to knock it down for a coupla thousand a years worth of filum shoots. Definitely worth more than a Supermarkesters and gym to them
is this a Woolworth now ...No+Pro wrote:it is hereBrodes wrote:Where abouts is this, is it still standing ?No+Pro wrote:Aahh where were you brave, selfless location preservers when this one was under fire?
I'm sure youse could have convinced woolies not to knock it down for a coupla thousand a years worth of filum shoots. Definitely worth more than a Supermarkesters and gym to them
-27.408483, 152.993808
are you going to help the above douche-canoe save this one too?
or what is it now as me and my friend are keen to explore it ?
Unless you have a time travelling machine theres nothing to explore there now.Brodes wrote:is this a Woolworth now ...No+Pro wrote:it is hereBrodes wrote:
Where abouts is this, is it still standing ?
-27.408483, 152.993808
are you going to help the above douche-canoe save this one too?
Sharing spots with random people isn't a good idea, especially if they aren't already incredibly trashed.Brisbex_Kings1 wrote:Hi i have several locations (abandoned buildings in the brisbane area) willing to share with anyone who has any locations in the Brisbane area
